Web Accessibility Evaluation Report
Visma EasyCruit - Career Pages Templates
Evaluation Details
Report Creator: Sherry Fahimi
Evaluation Commissioner(s): Maurice Eppenga
Last updated: 2025-07-10
Executive Summary
This report outlines the findings from the accessibility audit conducted to assess the EasyCruit Career pages templates [demo.easycruit.com] compliance with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. The audit aimed to identify accessibility barriers that could impede people with disabilities from accessing content and services.
The audit covered a representative sample of web pages and content types across [demo.easycruit.com], including:
Home page - Open vacancies
Vacancy page
Send application/Privacy policy page
Application form
Login pages
Table of Contents
Scope of Responsibility
Scope
Methodology
Web Technologies Relied Upon
Detailed Audit Results
Conclusion and Next Steps
Appendices and Additional Resources
Scope of Responsibility
This section clarifies the responsibilities and expectations regarding the accessibility compliance of the career pages utilizing our platform.
Our Responsibilities
We conduct audits on the core version of our platform template for compliance with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG).
Our reports reflect the accessibility status of the standard template, without any client-specific customizations.
We continuously work to ensure that our application meets general accessibility standards.
Client Responsibilities
Any customizations made to the platform template are outside the scope of our standard audit.
Clients are responsible for conducting their own accessibility audits on customizations to ensure compliance with applicable laws and guidelines.
Clients should consider region-specific accessibility requirements, such as those mandated by, for example, Dutch and Norwegian public sector regulations.
Disclaimers
Our audit reports do not address modifications beyond the generic platform template.
Compliance with accessibility standards may vary based on client-specific changes, and these should be independently verified by the client.
Scope
Website Name: Demo.easycruit.com
Scope of the Website: All web content of the template website of EasyCruit Career pages, located at 'http://www.demo.easycruit.com'
WCAG Version: 2.2
Conformance Target: AA
Accessibility Support Baseline: All web content of the template website of EasyCruit Career pages, located at 'http://www.demo.easycruit.com'
Methodology
Listed below are the evaluation tools and techniques used in the audit, along with the web technologies.
Automated Testing:
WAVE by WebAIM
Axe by Deque Systems
Lighthouse by Google
IBM Equal Access Accessibility Checker
Manual Testing:
Keyboard navigation
Screen reader (VoiceOver(macOS), NVDA(Windows))
Text resize and Zoom
Color Contrast Checker
Web Browser Inspect Tool
Web Technologies Relied Upon
This section highlights the key web technologies that underpin the website's accessibility. Understanding these technologies is vital for assessing compliance with WCAG standards and informs the selection of evaluation tools listed below.
✅HTML
✅CSS
✅WAI-ARIA
✅JavaScript
✅SVG
✅jQuery
Detailed Audit Results
Summary
Reported on 55 WCAG 2.2 AA Success Criteria
Passed Failed Cannot tell Not present Not checked
42 0 0 13 0
All applicable success criteria were tested using a combination of manual and automated methods. Below are the results.
This audit assessed all 55 success criteria that fall under WCAG 2.2 Levels A and AA. While WCAG 2.2 is commonly referenced as containing 50 Level A and AA criteria, some guidelines split compound requirements or include newer additions introduced in WCAG 2.2, which brings the practical testing total to 55. No AAA-level or deprecated criteria were included in this evaluation. The results presented here reflect the full and current scope of Level A and AA compliance as defined by the W3C.
Perceivable
1.1. Text alternatives
VismaGPT
Here’s the unformatted, plain text version of your content to ensure readability while maintaining the original information:
Perceivable
1.1. Text alternatives
1.1.1 Non-text Content: Passed
1.2. Time-based Media
1.2.1: Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded): Not present
1.2.2: Captions (Prerecorded): Not present
1.2.3: Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded): Not present
1.2.4: Captions (Live): Not present
1.2.5: Audio Description (Prerecorded): Not present
1.3. Adaptable
1.3.1: Info and Relationships: Passed
1.3.2: Meaningful Sequence: Passed
1.3.3: Sensory Characteristics: Passed
1.3.4: Orientation: Passed
1.3.5: Identify Input Purpose: Passed
1.4. Distinguishable
1.4.1: Use of Color: Passed
1.4.2: Audio Control: Not present
1.4.3: Contrast (Minimum): Passed
1.4.4: Resize text: Passed
1.4.5: Images of Text: Passed
1.4.10: Reflow: Passed
1.4.11: Non-text Contrast: Passed
1.4.12: Text Spacing: Passed
1.4.13: Content on Hover or Focus: Passed
Operable
2.1. Keyboard Accessible
2.1.1: Keyboard: Passed
2.1.2: No Keyboard Trap: Passed
2.1.4: Character Key Shortcuts: Not present
2.2. Enough Time
2.2.1: Timing Adjustable: Passed
2.2.2: Pause, Stop, Hide: Not present
2.3. Seizures and Physical Reactions
2.3.1: Three Flashes or Below Threshold: Passed
2.4. Navigable
2.4.1: Bypass Blocks: Passed
2.4.2: Page Titled: Passed
2.4.3: Focus Order: Passed
2.4.4: Link Purpose (In Context): Passed
2.4.5: Multiple Ways: Passed
2.4.6: Headings and Labels: Passed
2.4.7: Focus Visible: Passed
2.4.11: Focus Not Obscured (Minimum): Passed
2.5. Input Modalities
2.5.1: Pointer Gestures: Passed
2.5.2: Pointer Cancellation: Passed
2.5.3: Label in Name: Passed
2.5.4: Motion Actuation: Not present
2.5.7: Dragging Movements: Not present
2.5.8: Target Size (Minimum): Passed
Understandable
3.1. Readable
3.1.1: Language of Page: Passed
3.1.2: Language of Parts: Passed
3.2. Predictable
3.2.1: On Focus: Passed
3.2.2: On Input: Passed
3.2.3: Consistent Navigation: Passed
3.2.4: Consistent Identification: Passed
3.2.6: Consistent Help: Passed
3.3. Input Assistance
3.3.1: Error Identification: Passed
3.3.2: Labels or Instructions: Passed
3.3.3: Error Suggestion: Passed
3.3.4: Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data): Not present
3.3.7: Redundant Entry: Not present
3.3.8: Accessible Authentication (Minimum): Passed
Robust
4.1. Compatible
4.1.2: Name, Role, Value: Passed
4.1.3: Status Messages: Not present
Conclusion and Next Steps
Following our latest WCAG 2.2 assessment, we are pleased to report that the EasyCruit Career Page templates meet all applicable Level AA success criteria. Out of 55 criteria, 42 were applicable and passed, while 13 were not relevant to the current implementation.
This result reflects our ongoing commitment to accessibility and inclusive design. While no issues were identified in this audit, we will continue to monitor changes to the platform and web standards to ensure continued compliance.
Looking ahead, we encourage clients using custom templates to perform their own accessibility evaluations to account for any modifications. Our team remains available to support partners in their efforts to create equal access for all users.
Appendices and Additional Resources
Note: The audit archive, including screenshots and supporting materials, will be made available at a later date.